STOWiki talk:Policy/Editing

Please note the difference between Phaser Beam Array and Dual Plasma Beam Bank. We have a difference in style here where the next section (Modifiers) is narrower than the full page on the Plasma pages and extends the full width of the page on the Phaser pages. I "corrected" the Plasma Beam Array page thinking it was an error when I was adding the icon to it. Do we have a consensus how we would like this to be across the board? Col Kernel 02:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I moved this discussion to the Discussion page of this article (even though it doesn't yet exist). Later today I'm going to come up with a set guideline for item pages, as it's still under revision. For now, suffice it to say, tables aren't really the way to go. I know for sure we're going to use the icon template for the icon, and if the first header is cut off by the tooltip info box, the clear template can be used to clear the floats (e.g. the tooltip floats to the right) and thus have the header display as full-width. Thanks for bringing this to our attention! – TerranRich (ETC) @ 19:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem on moving it, if I'd been paying attention I'd have put it here myself originally.


 * I've found more pages with the same formatting as the Plasma were, since you've standardized the plasma I'll go ahead and start working other item pages as i get the chance.


 * I'm not sure why you're unhappy with the tables, they seem to work well. My issue was with the Info template being in the wrong place (top of section instead of bottom of section).  Col Kernel 08:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)