User talk:SabbyVII

Hello, SabbyVII.

I appreciate your dedication to the Wiki. I wish more people made edits!

As for the Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit, no discussion was needed. The ship is called the "Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit." Why did someone create a page with the wrong name in the first place?

Also, I didn't remove any material from the pages you created. I simply copied it all into a new page with a proper name. We don't have separate pages for the Sovereign class and the Noble class and the Regent class and the Imperial class. These are simply the skins that can be used on the ship. Yes, only one skin becomes available with the purchase of a Dyson Science Destroyer, but can all skins be used on all ships if a player purchases a 3-pack? If all skins can be used on a ship, then all classes must be listed on a page.

This is the key to creating pages: class = skin; ship = unique console config and BOff setup. Ships have pages; classes do not.

Since Cryptic gave the Starfleet and Romulan ships the same names (Dyson Reconnaissance Science Destroyer), I propose the pages for these ships on the Wiki should use the class name and the ship name: Montgomery Dyson Reconnaissance Science Destroyer and Harpia Dyson Reconnaissance Science Destroyer, respectively. Or check the shipyard in-game and add the word Montgomery or Harpia to it. The Klingon ships could, theoretically, be named only "Dyson Tactical Science Destroyer." But if we are including the "Montgomery" and "Harpia" in the the Starfleet and Romulan pages, we should include the "Chontay" in the Klingon ship's name.

I didn't have time to finish creating the new pages and, since I hope we now have a common goal, we can work together to finish the job. Also, since Cryptic migrated their entire website to the new Arc one, ALL links to Dev Blogs on the STO Wiki are now dead-ends, including the ones on the Advanced Dyson Science Destroyer pages. This should keep us busy for a while ;)

I appreciate your hard work and dedication to making this Wiki the best it can be. I hope our future projects complement each other!

Best regards, @Tiberius (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)