Star Trek Online Wiki
Explore
Main Page
All Pages
Interactive Maps
STO wiki
Sandbox
About STO
STO basics
Wiki guidelines
Wiki policies
Communications
Community portal
Community talk
Suggestion Box
Admin noticeboard
Discord #wiki-talk
STO User Hub
In-Game Chat
Quick links
Playable starship
Starship traits
Sets
Abilities
Damage (space)
Player rank
Reputation
Specialization
Seasons
Mission Journal
TFOs
Endeavors
Lobi crystals
Factions
Starfleet
Klingon Empire
Romulan Republic
TOS Starfleet
Dominion
DSC Starfleet
FANDOM
Fan Central
BETA
Games
Anime
Movies
TV
Video
Wikis
Explore Wikis
Community Central
Start a Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Sign In
Sign In
Register
Star Trek Online Wiki
20,301
pages
Explore
Main Page
All Pages
Interactive Maps
STO wiki
Sandbox
About STO
STO basics
Wiki guidelines
Wiki policies
Communications
Community portal
Community talk
Suggestion Box
Admin noticeboard
Discord #wiki-talk
STO User Hub
In-Game Chat
Quick links
Playable starship
Starship traits
Sets
Abilities
Damage (space)
Player rank
Reputation
Specialization
Seasons
Mission Journal
TFOs
Endeavors
Lobi crystals
Factions
Starfleet
Klingon Empire
Romulan Republic
TOS Starfleet
Dominion
DSC Starfleet
Talk:
Hangar pet
Back to page
Add topic
Edit source
View history
Edit Page
Talk:Hangar pet
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Move== Love the page, but not all craft that can be launched from carriers are fighters. I really think we should adopt a more general, MMOish term like 'pet' or 'summon' here. Either way though, something like 'Combat pets', 'Carrier pets', 'Carrier craft' or something. --[[User:SomeGuy|SomeGuy]] 09:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC) : The official term seems to be "Carrier pet" based on the release notes. —[[User:Dr_ishmael|Dr Ishmael]] [[File:User_Dr_ishmael_Diablo_the_chicken.gif|link=User_talk:Dr_ishmael]] 12:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC) :::When I made the page I wasn't sure what to call it so I just used "fighters". If the term "carrier pet" is used in the release notes I would go vote / suggest going for that and redirect all related pages / links there (e.g [[fighter]], [[pet]] etc).--[[User:Novalight|Novalight]] 12:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC) ::::I suggest moving this page to [[Hangar Pet]] as they are usually called like that in various forums and post-2012 patch notes. At one point they may have been exclusive to Carrier type of ships but since then other ship types have hangar bays. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 15:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC) ::::: I support this idea. --[[User:PiralDorrm|PiralDorrm]] ([[User talk:PiralDorrm|talk]]) 18:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC) == Hangar pet modifiers section == Is it possible to add icons to the Hangar Pet modifiers section? [[User:SFC3|SFC3]] ([[User talk:SFC3|talk]]) 00:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC) :Yeah, changes can be made through {{t|Hangar modifiers}} template which affect all pages that use it (some hangar pets also have it). --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 01:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC) == Procurement section == I was going to edit the Procurement section to make Carriers (and the other usages of this type of ship) into a singular form but looks like someone set it up to be plural. It does read right to me the way it is currently. Opinions? --[[User:Drmike|Drmike]] 14:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC) == Clean up and additions == Sorry for all the edit spam, but I decided to bring this a bit more up to spec. -Added the missing Jem'Hadar carriers from the Dominion Box and their pets. -Added ability ranks to the relevant pets to reflect their stats more accurately and show the comparison with their advanced versions better. -Cleaned up a few typos, missing icons and other misc info, and corrected the EC price of Rare pets, since it was well wrong (Confirmed in game) I did not add the starting pets for the ships still missing them, since I don't have those ships to check, and the ships' own pages did not have the info.[[Special:Contributions/121.99.48.18|121.99.48.18]] 13:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC) I've also added the Vesta triumvirate to the standard issue section. It seemed unneccessary to me to add all three, since they're pretty much the same ship. I did choose not to list them as an escort carrier, since the game lists them seperately on item cards for weapons and hangar pets. Feel free to change it if you would rather have all three variants for completeness, but I think it looks tidier and more concise this way.[[Special:Contributions/121.99.48.18|121.99.48.18]] 14:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC) ==Special Pets Section== I thought this needed cleaning up, especially with the knowledge that the Tholian Widows will be moved to the new Tholian Reputation and the fact that new Mesh Weaver pets were coming out. I therefore renamed the section to Cross-Faction pets to better describe its purpose (though Reputation pets might be broken out into another major section later), and moved the Romulan Reputation pets to their own chart for reference. I did the same for the Recluse pets, the Jem'Hadar pets, and I added the Mesh Weaver stats from Tribble as far as I remembered them. Two issues: One, the Mesh Weaver has two Dual Beam Banks and I was conflicted as to how to represent this. I settled on two icons for the Dual Beam Banks, but someone else might have another idea. Second, I was not sure what to do about the fact that the JHEC and JHDC both have the Jem'Hadar Fighters as standard and only the JHDC can mount the Attack Ship pets. If anyone has a better suggestion for this, again, all ears. [[Special:Contributions/24.57.52.85|24.57.52.85]] 03:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC) ==Hanger pet pages== Data can be spread around several pages so I wanted to see how would hangar pet articles look if we merge regular, advanced and elite pet together. Similar to console set pages, it allows easier comparison and preview. If it doesn't look good, we can easily have separate pages like we currently use. See: [[Hangar - Class F Shuttles]]. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 18:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC) I like it...Lets do it [[User:Jacobsodinforever2000|Jacobsodinforever2000]] ([[User talk:Jacobsodinforever2000|talk]]) 19:38, 31 August 2017 (UTC) :Thanks for the feedback. I'll wait for a few more replies because I may be rushing with radical changes on the wiki. :D --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 19:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC) :Only flaw I see is the article name and first heading have the same name. Any idea here? Or to keep it that way. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 20:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC) ::What would you want it to be? One suggestion I would make is to create a template for the modifiers so there is only one place to add/delete future changes for hangar_pet_modifiers instead of on every single hangar pet page. That and have the Advanced/elite pages point to their appropriate spot on this page etc etc. [[User:Asanad|Asanad]] ([[User talk:Asanad|talk]]) 19:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC) :::I already made {{t|Hangar modifiers}} template so that is covered. Just wanted to see if there is better way to set page that has all 3 types of hangar pets. [[Hangar - Class F Shuttles]] is example how it could look. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 23:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC) ::::Until TippingOver feature for infobox is switched off, [[Hangar - Class F Shuttles]] can't be the main page for all 3 variants. Instead we could use [[Hangar Pet/Class F Shuttles]] as main article. Any opinion on this? --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 12:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC) ===2019 edition=== <s>Check the {{t|test}} page</s> for my attempt to simplify the creation of hangar pet pages (as more and more of them are missing). Idea is to have {{rare}} variant as main page for each pet, which would use tabber to also show the advanced and elite variant. I removed the section with "equipment and abilities" because it is already present in the infobox and page is too short (in my opinion) to repeat the same info two times. I'll probably have to adjust the template for some specific cases, but for now any additional info should go under notes. I'd appreciate if you could help with better wording or any suggestion that could improve it, and let me know if I missed something. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 02:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC) : Hey Damixon. I've tried making some modifications to your template. I've added the hangar pet icon, as well as info on whether it is restricted to certain ships. The only downside is that the table is no longer sortable. What do you think? {| class="wikitable" style="font-size: 90%;width: 100%;" |- ! align="center" width="5px" | <!--faction--> ! align="center" width="50px" | Role ! align="center" width="70px" | Fighter ! align="center" width="10px" | Squad ! align="center" width="80px" | Weapon ! align="center" | Abilities |- <!-- Romulan Drone Ship --> {{hangartableTest |faction=Romulan |role=Frigate |hangar=Romulan Drone Ship |squad=1/2 |restriction=''Scimitar''-class Dreadnought Warbirds and [[Kelvin Timeline T'laru Intel Carrier Warbird]] |allW1={{iconlink2|Plasma Beam Array|16px}} |allW2={{iconlink2|Plasma Beam Array|16px}} |allW3={{iconlink2|Plasma Beam Array|16px}} |allP1={{iconlink2|Plasma Torpedo Launcher|16px}} |allA4=Multi-Spectral Emitters |allA5={{ability|Tri-Phasic Emitters}} |allA1=Beams: Overload |r#1=I |vr#1=II |ur#1=III |allA2=Beams: Fire at Will |r#2=I |vr#2=II |ur#2=III |allA3=Emergency Power to Shields |r#3=I |vr#3=II |ur#3=III }} |} : You can check the whole Romulan table on [[User:PiralDorrm/Test]]. --[[User:PiralDorrm|PiralDorrm]] ([[User talk:PiralDorrm|talk]]) 20:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC) ::Your version looks better, and gives more info - you can replace current Hangartable template with it. Sorting isn't needed really so it isn't an issue. If you know simpler way to add weapons and abilities (instead of those allA1, r#1), go ahead - I'm still not sure if it was the best approach, but at least it reduces the amount of text. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 21:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC) ::: I'll get on it. I've tried simplifying it, but wasn't successful. I'll try playing with it a little more, but I think it's as simple as it can get. You really did a good job on the original template. --[[User:PiralDorrm|PiralDorrm]] ([[User talk:PiralDorrm|talk]]) 17:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC) ===2020 edition=== Since various hangar pets are being merged to one page, here is another option which mimics SFC's hangar pet pages. This template reduces the amount of text per hangar pet page to make the creation of new pages easier so I think it should be considered. "Restriction" parameter will show whatever infobox has under "who". "Restriction" and "ship" are both optional. Template will have to be adjusted to show weapons under base cooldown (it is not part of the tabber at the moment). It can be done so that it automatically adds whatever infobox has under "ttext" (less stuff to add when creating new hangar pet page), or it can be manually added (which allows style adjustments, link to different page, etc). Just an option, doesn't have to go live. Feel free to give suggestions or update the template itself. --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 01:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC) <nowiki>{{hangartabber |hangar=Stalker Fighter Squadron |ship=[[Caitian Aspero Support Carrier]] |restriction=yes |available=unlock |type=fighter |r= ** {{item|Tetryon Pulse Cannon}} ** {{ability|Thoron Pulse}} |vr= ** {{item|Tetryon Pulse Cannon}} ** {{ability|Thoron Pulse}} |ur= ** {{item|Tetryon Pulse Cannon}} ** {{item|Tetryon Dual Cannons}} ** {{ability|Thoron Pulse}} }}</nowiki> ..will produce this: ''{{color|grey|Template removed because talk page was added to the cargo table.}}'' : Looks great. --[[User:PiralDorrm|PiralDorrm]] ([[User talk:PiralDorrm|talk]]) 11:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC) ::Thank you. Here is another template which is very similar to {{t|hangartable}}, but this one will be used on individual hangar pet pages, and later used to automatically populate tables on the [[Hangar pet]] page (once all hangar pets have their own page, and some adjustments are made hangartable template will be retired). New tables can be quickly created for individual pets using {{t|hangaroverview}} because all template parameters can be copy/pasted from the hangar pet table, with exemption of "energy" and "torp" type shown in text (on the individual pages), which are not present on Hangar pet group page. Also, cargo didn't allow "unlock" so parameter was renamed to "unlocked". --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 16:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC) <nowiki>{{hangaroverview |faction=Federation |role=Attack |hangar=Stalker Fighter Squadron |squad=3/6 |unlocked=Caitian Aspero Support Carrier |allW1={{iconlink2|Tetryon Cannon|16px|Tetryon Pulse Cannon}} |allP1=[[File:Thoron Pulse icon (Federation).png|16px|link=]] |allA1=Thoron Pulse |r+vr+urA2=[[#Notes|Hull Signature Masked]] |vrA3={{ability|Antiproton Sweep}} |urA3={{ability|Antiproton Sweep}} |urA4={{ability|Battle Cloak}} |energy=[[Tetryon weapons (space)|Tetryon]] |torp=[[#Notes|Thoron]] }}</nowiki> ..will produce this: ''{{color|grey|Template removed because talk page was added to the cargo table.}}'' --[[User:Damixon|Damixon]] ([[User talk:Damixon|talk]]) 11:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to the Star Trek Online Wiki are considered to be released under the CC BY-NC-SA
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Ability
(
view source
)
Template:Color
(
view source
)
Template:HangartableTest
(
view source
)
Template:Iconlink2
(
view source
)
Template:Rare
(
view source
)
Template:T
(
view source
)
Template:T/piece
(
view source
)
Follow on IG
TikTok
Join Fan Lab