Lord Trekie (talk | contribs) |
Rayfire3559 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
What sort of naming conventions are we going with here? i.e. Hyper Injection Singularity Core or Hyper Injection Singularity Warp Core? I uploaded a few level-less icons for the various cores, but it seems some of them exist, just under different names... |
What sort of naming conventions are we going with here? i.e. Hyper Injection Singularity Core or Hyper Injection Singularity Warp Core? I uploaded a few level-less icons for the various cores, but it seems some of them exist, just under different names... |
||
--[[User:Lord_Trekie|LordTrekie]] <small>([[User_talk:Lord_Trekie|talk]])</small> 04:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
--[[User:Lord_Trekie|LordTrekie]] <small>([[User_talk:Lord_Trekie|talk]])</small> 04:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Well even though they're all warp cores, the in game seems to favor simply Singularity Core and Warp Core, so I suppose we should go with that standard. <span style="color: #999999;">—</span> [[User:Rayfire3559|<small>'''Rayfire'''</small>]] [[Image:User-FED-Sig.png|link=User talk:Rayfire]] 06:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:03, 3 July 2013
I suggest splitting this page in to Warp Cores and Singularity Cores, as per game item description. Does anyone else think this is a good idea? --NCODB (talk) 11:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I could see it working either way. They do have quite a lot of overlap. The only part that's a little cluttered is the modifiers section, but I'm not sure how to improve that. I'll think about it a bit.--Eklinaar (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think there's sufficient commonality to leave it as a single page for now. A large part of that is that neither actually has enough as a separate article. While the Singularity Core subsection would allow for descriptions of Singularity powers, the Antimatter core part would be comparatively sparse. — Rayfire
15:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think there's sufficient commonality to leave it as a single page for now. A large part of that is that neither actually has enough as a separate article. While the Singularity Core subsection would allow for descriptions of Singularity powers, the Antimatter core part would be comparatively sparse. — Rayfire
I agree
I agree especially when the information comes out on crafting, which will be different for the two factions.
Naming Conventions
What sort of naming conventions are we going with here? i.e. Hyper Injection Singularity Core or Hyper Injection Singularity Warp Core? I uploaded a few level-less icons for the various cores, but it seems some of them exist, just under different names... --LordTrekie (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Well even though they're all warp cores, the in game seems to favor simply Singularity Core and Warp Core, so I suppose we should go with that standard. — Rayfire 06:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)