Dyson Science Destroyers[edit source]
Can I please ask why you moved the federation dyson science destroyers? I put a lot of work into those pages and would have appreciated it if you left a note on the respective discussion pages before moving them. For example the Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit went though a discussion before it was moved from Fleet Assault Cruiser.
Also, the move makes these 4 pages inconsistent with the other 8 pages for the KDF and Rom versions of these ships.
Could you please get in contact with me by leaving a note on my talk page or by sending me a mail message in game to @sabby7.
Reply to Last Message[edit source]
I created the Fleet Assault Cruiser page and made the mistake because it does not follow the trend which other federation cruisers set like the star cruiser set of ships (normal, refit, retrofit, fleet). While they had every right to do so, a few other members moved the page to the right place but they still left a note on the discussion page beforehand which gave me a chance to explain why the page was in the wrong place and made me feel a bit more appreciated :)
I know none of the content is lost by the move you made. I just feel a bit saddened to have lost the credit for it without any notice (my name wont show up in the histories anymore).
I understand the distinction between skins and ship classes and ship types. The reason I set out the page names in the way I did was to avoid the clash that you mentioned where some of the ship types have exactly the same name. Now that you have moved them, I suggest you attach the faction name in front of all of them to avoid confusion. For example: "Starfleet Dyson Reconnaissance Science Destroyer" and "Romulan Dyson Reconnaissance Science Destroyer". We could do the same for the KDF ships too as you suggested.
I think the old links will still redirect to the new arc page? The few I have used seem to do so.
Thanks for writing back. Looking forward to those future projects.